Key Differences Between Google vs Microsoft Ad Types
Microsoft allows for more precise targeting of audience blocks, including dialing your advertising down to demographic, geolocation, and type of device used by potential customers. A downside to Microsoft Ads is the scope of the advertising is limited to Microsoft users.
For example, Microsoft ads potentially go to all Bing users, while Google Ads go to all Google search users. The vast majority of Bing users are in the USA. Google has the potential to reach virtually anyone with online access.
Greater reach means Google has an inherently larger universe of users because Google has a search engine that is more widely used. While advertisements can be more targeted using Microsoft Ads, more people get “touched” using Google.
Is One Better Than The Other?
Neither is “better” in a general advertising sense. A bad advertisement will not garner clicks, for instance, no matter what format is used. To generate a higher response, advertisers must put thought into their presentation, keywords, and message.
Google has a broader reach, while Microsoft allows for more precise targeting. Each, in its own way, creates an environment that could yield a higher response rate.
Do Not Restrict Yourself
What the advantages of Google Ads and Microsoft Ads mean is that every user of Google Ad types or Microsoft Ad types should mix and match, depending on their product and service offers. Very few customers will only find one advertising method effective. Most will find that their customer base is diverse and would be responsive in both environments if the advertisement gets presented properly.
For example, if your target audience is “rock collectors,” your best bet would be to advertise using the Google Ads platform. If, however, your target audience was “Male laptop users on the West Coast between the ages of 50 and 69 that collect rocks,” the Microsoft platform would likely yield better results.
It is important to note that Google will touch the same users as Microsoft, but the targeted message will more likely appeal to specific users via the Microsoft platform. The best way of looking at this is the broad strokes versus narrow strokes analogy. Broad strokes will envelop narrower strokes, but narrower strokes are more precise.
To Conclude
The Google vs Microsoft Ad types comparison is an assessment of two completely different forms of advertising. Both Google Ad types and Microsoft Ad Types have their own ideal advertising environment. Neither should be looked at from an advertiser’s perspective as competing, even though both companies are competitors.
The correct way to view both ad mechanisms is that they are most effective when used in tandem. By employing both at the same time, an advertiser vastly increases its reach both with known potential target audiences and with new audiences.